From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
To: Richard Fontana <fontana2012@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] copyleft-next: project name / remove anti-tivoization clause
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:48:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342115325-9443-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (raw)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
My last series of patches require a rebase based on the
latest changes, so patches 1-4 are a simple rebase.
Patch 5 and 6 address removing the anti-tivoization
clause, section 7. This will at the very least clarify
whether or not copyleft-next can or cannot be considered
as a licensing project with hopes of using it for the
Linux kernel.
Given copyleft-next's focus on separating from the
Church and in my views any possible 'corporate taint',
I'm in hopes that copyleft-next *can* consider the
Linux kernel community as a possible future and
valuable stakeholder.
Luis R. Rodriguez (6):
copyleft-next: remove issue tracker references
copyleft-next: more project name updates Copyleft.next->copyleft-next
copyleft-next: rename the file COPYLEFT.next to copyleft-next
copyleft-next: embrace the Signed-off-by practice
copyleft-next: remove section 7 - Tivoization
copyleft-next: re-enumerate sections
ABOUT | 10 ++---
CONTRIBUTING | 45 ++++++++++++++------
COPYLEFT.next => copyleft-next | 90 ++++++++++------------------------------
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
rename COPYLEFT.next => copyleft-next (82%)
--
1.7.10.rc1.22.gf5241
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 17:48 Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2012-07-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] copyleft-next: remove issue tracker references Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] copyleft-next: more project name updates Copyleft.next->copyleft-next Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] copyleft-next: rename the file COPYLEFT.next to copyleft-next Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] copyleft-next: embrace the Signed-off-by practice Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] copyleft-next: remove section 7 - anti-tivoization Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-12 18:19 ` Alan Cox
2012-07-12 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] copyleft-next: re-enumerate sections Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342115325-9443-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=bkuhn@ebb.org \
--cc=fontana2012@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome