From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: 3.4.4-rt13: btrfs + xfstests 006 = BOOM.. and a bonus rt_mutex deadlock report for absolutely free!
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:38:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342273096.7368.57.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120713125043.GH30128@shiny>
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 08:50 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> There is also a chunk of code in btrfs_clear_path_blocking that makes
> sure to strictly honor top down locking order during the conversion. It
> only does this when lockdep is enabled because in non-RT kernels we
> don't need to worry about it. For RT we'll want to enable that as well.
Hm, _seems_ that alone is enough prevent deadlock. Throughput really
sucks though. The other bits of my stab bump throughput for dbench 128
from ~200 mb/s to ~360 mb/s (appears it's the paranoid trylock loops).
ext3 does 775 mb/s with the same kernel. Or, dbench 8 on ext3 gives
~1800 mb/s and ~480 mb/s btrfs. Not exactly wonderful.
Hohum, guess I'll wait and see what your patch looks like. I bet it'll
work a lot better than mine does :)
-Mike
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-14 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 5:47 Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 8:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 9:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 11:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 13:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 13:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 13:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 13:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 13:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-13 6:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-13 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 10:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-13 10:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 10:47 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-13 12:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 11:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 17:09 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-13 10:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 12:50 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-13 14:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-14 10:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-15 17:56 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-16 2:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 16:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-16 16:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 16:35 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-16 16:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 17:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-17 4:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-17 4:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-17 4:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-17 4:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-17 4:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-17 12:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 10:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 15:43 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-16 16:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-14 13:38 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342273096.7368.57.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome