mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: sysfs permissions on dynamic attributes (led delay_on and delay_off)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:33:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342856010.21788.47.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120721040816.GA7313@kroah.com>

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:46:14PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> > I'm trying to use the standard ledtrig-timer.c code to handle led
> > blinking for notifications on an Android device, and I'm hitting some
> > issues with setting permissions on the dynamically created delay_on
> > and delay_off attributes.  For most sysfs files, we have userspace
> > uevent parser that watches for device add notifications and
> > chowns/chmods attributes.  This doesn't work for delay_on and
> > delay_off, because they are created later, when "timer" is written to
> > the trigger attribute.  There is no uevent when the new files are
> > created, and sysfs doesn't support inotify, so I don't see any way to
> > receive an event to set the permissions.  This issue exists any time
> > that device_create_file is called after device_add.
> > 
> > What is the appropriate way to get an event to set the permissions?
> > Add inotify support for sysfs file creation?  Send a KOBJ_CHANGE
> > uevent in device_create_file?
> 
> No.
> 
> > Send a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent from the driver after calling
> > device_create_file?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Dynamically create a timer device under /sys/class/leds/<led> so a new
> > add uevent gets sent?
> 
> Ick.
> 
> > Promote blinking to be a core led feature instead of a trigger, so the
> > files are always present?
> 
> That's the best thing, why not just do that?

This implies we should make every trigger a core led feature and
effectively do away with triggers. I'm not sure that makes sense.

Cheers,

Richard


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-21  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-21  0:46 Colin Cross
2012-07-21  4:08 ` Greg KH
2012-07-21  5:14   ` Colin Cross
2012-07-21 15:07     ` Greg KH
2012-07-21  7:33   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-07-21  8:26     ` Colin Cross
2012-07-21 11:21       ` Richard Purdie
2012-07-21 14:31         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-07-21 15:42         ` Colin Cross
2012-07-21 16:08           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-07-21 16:15             ` Greg KH
2012-07-21 16:23               ` Colin Cross
2012-07-21 16:13           ` Greg KH
2012-07-21 16:22             ` Colin Cross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342856010.21788.47.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bryan.wu@canonical.com \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome