From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751376Ab2G0Ojf (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:39:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:63002 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751004Ab2G0Oje (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:39:34 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,667,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="13737399" Message-ID: <1343399971.25096.8.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/24] xen/arm: hypercalls From: Ian Campbell To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Stefano Stabellini , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Tim (Xen.org)" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:39:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120727142101.GA6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1343316846-25860-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <20120726163352.GC9222@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1343380659.6812.106.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20120727142101.GA6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:21 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:02:18PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > > +/****************************************************************************** > > > > > + * hypercall.h > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Linux-specific hypervisor handling. > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Stefano Stabellini , Citrix, 2012 > > > > > + * > > > > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > > > > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 > > > > > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; or, when distributed > > > > > + * separately from the Linux kernel or incorporated into other > > > > > + * software packages, subject to the following license: > > > > > + * > > > > > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy > > > > > + * of this source file (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without > > Erm, is that an additional restriction on the GPL which prevents me from > shipping this code on a CD and charging for the act of creating the CD > and shipping it? That would technically make the above statement > incompatible with the GPL. There's an "or" in there. The non-GPL alternative license is the standard one applied by upstream Xen to the interface headers: http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/file/tip/xen/include/public/COPYING It's the X11/MIT license IIRC, which the FSF say is GPL compatible. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#X11License The same license is used a few other places in the kernel, e.g. the DRM code. Ian.