mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] preempt/hardirq.h: Fix comment about PREEMPT_ACTIVE bit location
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:49:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343706583.27983.28.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720192459.6149.14821.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>

On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 00:54 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> PREEMPT_ACTIVE flag is bit 27, not 28. Fix the comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/hardirq.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/hardirq.h b/include/linux/hardirq.h
> index bb7f309..305f23c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hardirq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>   *
>   * - bits 16-25 are the hardirq count (max # of nested hardirqs: 1024)
>   * - bit 26 is the NMI_MASK
> - * - bit 28 is the PREEMPT_ACTIVE flag
> + * - bit 27 is the PREEMPT_ACTIVE flag

Sorry but in arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h we have:

#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE		0x10000000

Which happens to be the 28th bit, not 27th. Although, if an arch did not
define PREEMPT_ACTIVE it would be 27th.

Perhaps the correct thing to do is to say:

  By default the following bits are defined as:
	[...]
  Different architectures may modify these.

And then add your change.

-- Steve

>   *
>   * PREEMPT_MASK: 0x000000ff
>   * SOFTIRQ_MASK: 0x0000ff00



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 19:24 Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-07-26 15:15 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: " tip-bot for Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-07-31  3:49 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-08-14  8:26   ` [PATCH] preempt/hardirq.h: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-08-14  8:28   ` [PATCH] preempt/hardirq.h: Clarify " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-08-14 10:18     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-08-14 12:46       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1343706583.27983.28.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®