mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mk@dee.su,
	Marko Kohtala <marko.kohtala@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: efi: Turn off efi_enabled after setup on mixed fw/kernel
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:56:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345456601.3088.40.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345412920-10906-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net>

On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 14:48 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> When 32-bit EFI is used with 64-bit kernel (or vice versa), turn off
> efi_enabled once setup is done. Beyond setup, it is normally used to
> determine if runtime services are available and we will have none.
> 
> This will resolve issues stemming from efivars modprobe panicking on a
> 32/64-bit setup, as well as some reboot issues on similar setups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.4 and 3.5
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index f4b9b80..dad38ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	mcheck_init();
>  
>  	arch_init_ideal_nops();
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> +	/* Once setup is done above, disable efi_enabled on mismatched
> +	 * firmware/kernel archtectures since there is no support for
> +	 * runtime services.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) ^ efi_64bit) {
> +		pr_info("efi: Setup done, disabling due to 32/64-bit mismatch\n");
> +		efi_enabled = 0;
> +	}
> +#endif
>  }

Is there a reason we can't just disable efi_enabled at the end of
efi_init() if we're non-native, rather than having this chunk of code
here?


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-20  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-19 21:48 Olof Johansson
2012-08-20  9:56 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2012-08-20 10:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-08-20 21:59   ` Olof Johansson
2012-08-21 14:39     ` Matt Fleming
2012-08-21 14:53       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-08 14:28 ` Matt Fleming
2012-10-24  6:24   ` [PATCH v2] " Olof Johansson
2012-10-24  8:40     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-24 15:21       ` Olof Johansson
2012-10-24 15:50         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-24 17:00     ` [PATCH v3] " Olof Johansson
2012-10-25 10:56       ` Matt Fleming
2012-10-25 13:20       ` Matt Fleming
2012-10-25 17:05         ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1345456601.3088.40.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marko.kohtala@gmail.com \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=mk@dee.su \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome