From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
To: "ludovic.desroches" <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: JFFS2 issue with v3.5.x and later on Atmel chips at least (was: Kernel oops since v3.5.x on Atmel chips)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:41:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345707689.2848.203.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034F3F8.9080802@atmel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1534 bytes --]
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] JFFS2: fix unmount regression
This patch fixes regression introduced by
"8bdc81c jffs2: get rid of jffs2_sync_super". We submit a delayed work in order
to make sure the write-buffer is synchronized at some point. But we do not
flush it when we unmount, which causes an oops when we unmount the file-system
and then the delayed work is executed.
This patch fixes the issue by adding a "cancel_delayed_work_sync()" infocation
in the '->sync_fs()' handler. This will make sure the delayed work is canceled
on sync, unmount and re-mount. And because VFS always callse 'sync_fs()' before
unmounting or remounting, this fixes the issue.
Reported-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.5+]
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
---
Ludovic, would you please give this patch a test? Also attached.
fs/jffs2/super.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/super.c b/fs/jffs2/super.c
index 61ea413..e385fa3 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/super.c
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ static int jffs2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
struct jffs2_sb_info *c = JFFS2_SB_INFO(sb);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER))
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&c->wbuf_dwork);
+
mutex_lock(&c->alloc_sem);
jffs2_flush_wbuf_pad(c);
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
--
1.7.10.4
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-JFFS2-fix-unmount-regression.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1538 bytes --]
From 2f1554d01f7db58631f9da7dd19a7254d1096feb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] JFFS2: fix unmount regression
This patch fixes regression introduced by
"8bdc81c jffs2: get rid of jffs2_sync_super". We submit a delayed work in order
to make sure the write-buffer is synchronized at some point. But we do not
flush it when we unmount, which causes an oops when we unmount the file-system
and then the delayed work is executed.
This patch fixes the issue by adding a "cancel_delayed_work_sync()" infocation
in the '->sync_fs()' handler. This will make sure the delayed work is canceled
on sync, unmount and re-mount. And because VFS always callse 'sync_fs()' before
unmounting or remounting, this fixes the issue.
Reported-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.5+]
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
---
fs/jffs2/super.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/super.c b/fs/jffs2/super.c
index 61ea413..e385fa3 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/super.c
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ static int jffs2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
struct jffs2_sb_info *c = JFFS2_SB_INFO(sb);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER))
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&c->wbuf_dwork);
+
mutex_lock(&c->alloc_sem);
jffs2_flush_wbuf_pad(c);
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
--
1.7.10.4
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5034B45A.5060107@atmel.com>
[not found] ` <5034F3F8.9080802@atmel.com>
2012-08-23 6:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-23 7:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
[not found] ` <5035F266.2040909@atmel.com>
2012-08-23 12:37 ` JFFS2 issue with v3.5.x and later on Atmel chips at least Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345707689.2848.203.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome