From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] workqueue: ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:58:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346090307-3020-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346090307-3020-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
The compiler may compile this code into TWO write/modify instructions.
worker->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
worker->flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
so the other CPU may see the temporary of worker->flags which has
not WORKER_UNBOUND nor WORKER_REBIND, it will wrongly do local wake up.
so we use one write/modify instruction explicitly instead.
This bug will not occur on idle workers, because they have another
WORKER_NOT_RUNNING flags.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 96485c0..ed23c9a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1415,10 +1415,13 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
/* rebind busy workers */
for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) {
struct work_struct *rebind_work = &worker->rebind_work;
+ unsigned long worker_flags = worker->flags;
/* morph UNBOUND to REBIND */
- worker->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
- worker->flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
+ worker_flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
+ worker_flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
+ /* ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags */
+ ACCESS_ONCE(worker->flags) = worker_flags;
if (test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
work_data_bits(rebind_work)))
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 17:58 [PATCH 0/7] workqueue: cleanup rebind_workers() Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: wait on manager_mutex instead of rebind_hold Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] workqueue: simple clear WORKER_REBIND Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: explicit way to wait for idles workers to finish Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: single pass rebind_workers Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-29 2:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 17:58 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2012-08-27 20:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] workqueue: ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags Tejun Heo
2012-08-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] workqueue: init 0 for idle_rebind.cnt Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 20:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-28 4:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-28 7:04 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] workqueue: static idle_rebind Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-27 20:07 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346090307-3020-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®