From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix Oopses in nfs_lookup_revalidate and nfs4_lookup_revalidate
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:34:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346103286.20840.59.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA908F6E388@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1270 bytes --]
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 20:16 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:09 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:08:17PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > Fix the following Oops in 3.5.1:
[...]
> > > This Oops affects 3.5 kernels and older, and is due to lookup_one_len()
> > > calling down to the dentry revalidation code with a NULL pointer
> > > to struct nameidata.
> > >
> > > It is fixed upstream by commit 0b728e1911c (stop passing nameidata *
> > > to ->d_revalidate())
> >
> > So this is just a nfs-only backport of the larger patch 0b728e1911c,
> > right? Should we also do this for other filesystems as well? Or just
> > backport the whole commit?
>
> The larger patch involves a VFS api change (the atomic open code) which
> has a bunch of pre- and post-requirements. I'd assume that is a too
> large change for stable. I think that the smaller per-filesystem changes
> are probably more appropriate. The list of filesystems that care are
> likely to be small. Off the top of my head, I can only think of NFS,
> CIFS, FUSE and possibly ceph.
What is the earliest version that needs this fix?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 20:08 Trond Myklebust
2012-08-27 20:09 ` Greg KH
2012-08-27 20:16 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-08-27 20:23 ` Greg KH
2012-08-28 18:56 ` Jeff Layton
2012-08-27 21:34 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346103286.20840.59.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®