From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757056Ab2IKRlo (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:41:44 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:50728 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754912Ab2IKRjy (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:39:54 -0400 From: Cyril Chemparathy To: , CC: , , , , , , Cyril Chemparathy , Vitaly Andrianov Subject: [PATCH v3 15/17] ARM: mm: use physical addresses in highmem sanity checks Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:39:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1347385155-11643-16-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1347385155-11643-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> References: <1347385155-11643-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch modifies the highmem sanity checking code to use physical addresses instead. This change eliminates the wrap-around problems associated with the original virtual address based checks, and this simplifies the code a bit. The one constraint imposed here is that low physical memory must be mapped in a monotonically increasing fashion if there are multiple banks of memory, i.e., x < y must => pa(x) < pa(y). Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre --- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c index 95daa67..ac4e7ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c @@ -913,6 +913,7 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0; void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) { int i, j, highmem = 0; + phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1; for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) { struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j]; @@ -922,8 +923,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) highmem = 1; #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM - if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) + if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) highmem = 1; bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -932,8 +932,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping * the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later. */ - if (!highmem && __va(bank->start) < vmalloc_min && - bank->size > vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start)) { + if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit && + bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) { if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) { printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, " "ignoring high memory\n"); @@ -942,12 +942,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) (meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank)); meminfo.nr_banks++; i++; - bank[1].size -= vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); - bank[1].start = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1; + bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start; + bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit; bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1; j++; } - bank->size = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); + bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; } #else bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -967,8 +967,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would entirely overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) { + if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "Ignoring RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "(vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start, @@ -980,9 +979,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (__va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) <= __va(bank->start)) { - unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); + if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit) + unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start, -- 1.7.9.5