From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754355Ab2IXNK3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:10:29 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:56805 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752158Ab2IXNK2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:10:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1348492217.11847.60.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] console: implement lockdep support for console_lock From: Peter Zijlstra To: Daniel Vetter Cc: LKML , DRI Development , Dave Airlie , Thomas Gleixner , Alan Cox Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1347923013-4253-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1347923013-4253-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1348489027.11847.53.camel@twins> <1348489478.11847.55.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:54 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I've read through the patches and I'm hoping you don't volunteer me to > pick these up ... ;-) Worth a try, right? :-) > But there doesn't seem to be anything that would > get worse through this lockdep annotation patch, right? No indeed, your patch looks fine, I just wanted to comment on the printk() thing.