From: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 9/25] bug.h: Add BUILD_BUG_ON_NON_CONST macro
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:30:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348615859-10259-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348615467-9850-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com>
A very common use of __builtin_constant_p is to make sure that a certain
value is a compile time constant and generate a build-time error if it
is not. However, __builtin_constant_p is broken in a variety of ways in
various situations (on various versions of gcc) and never returns one in
an unoptimized build. This macro provide a mechanism to perform these
build-time checks, but not break unoptimized builds (or modules being
build with -O0), of which there probably aren't many people that care
anyway.
This patch documents all of the relevant quirks I could find in the
"Gory Details" section of the doc-comments. For almost all cases,
BUILD_BUG_ON_NON_CONST() should never fail on a primitive, non-pointer
type variable declared const. A subsequent patch provides a separate
macro for performing tests which are known to be broken in older
compilers (pretty much, using __builtin_constant_p on arrays, pointers &
structs as well as testing those values).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
---
include/linux/bug.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h
index c70b833..e30f600 100644
--- a/include/linux/bug.h
+++ b/include/linux/bug.h
@@ -81,6 +81,54 @@ struct pt_regs;
__build_bug_failed(); \
} while (0)
+/**
+ * BUILD_BUG_ON_NON_CONST - break compile if expression cannot be determined
+ * to be a compile-time constant.
+ * @exp: value to test for compile-time constness
+ *
+ * __builtin_constant_p() is a work in progress and is broken in various ways
+ * on various versions of gcc and optimization levels. It can fail, even when
+ * gcc otherwise determines that the expression is compile-time constant when
+ * performing actual optimizations and thus, compile out the value anyway. Do
+ * not use this macro for struct members or dereferenced pointers and arrays,
+ * as these are broken in many versions of gcc -- use BUILD_BUG_ON_NON_CONST42
+ * or another gcc-version-checked macro instead.
+ *
+ * As long as you are passing a variable declared const (and not modified),
+ * this macro should never fail (except for floats). For information on gcc's
+ * behavior in other cases, see below.
+ *
+ * Gory Details:
+ *
+ * Normal primitive variables
+ * - global non-static non-const values are never compile-time constants (but
+ * you should already know that)
+ * - all const values (global/local, non/static) should never fail this test
+ * (3.4+) with one exception (below)
+ * - floats (which we wont use anyway) are broken in various ways until 4.2
+ * (-O1 broken until 4.4)
+ * - local static non-const broken until 4.2 (-O1 broken until 4.3)
+ * - local non-static non-const broken until 4.0
+ *
+ * Dereferencing pointers & arrays
+ * - all static const derefs broken until 4.4 (except arrays at -O2 or better,
+ * which are fixed in 4.2)
+ * - global non-static const pointer derefs always fail (<=4.7)
+ * - local non-static const derefs broken until 4.3, except for array derefs
+ * to a zero value, which works from 4.0+
+ * - local static non-const pointers always fail (<=4.7)
+ * - local static non-const arrays broken until 4.4
+ * - local non-static non-const arrays broken until 4.0 (unless zero deref,
+ * works in 3.4+)
+
+ */
+#ifdef __OPTIMIZE__
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NON_CONST(exp) \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(exp))
+#else
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NON_CONST(exp)
+#endif
+
#endif /* __CHECKER__ */
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
--
1.7.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1348615467-9850-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com>
2012-09-25 23:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/25] compiler-gcc4.h: Correct verion check for __compiletime_error Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/25] compiler-gcc4.h: Reorder macros based upon gcc ver Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/25] compiler-gcc.h: Add gcc-recommended GCC_VERSION macro Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/25] compiler-gcc{3,4}.h: Use " Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 5/25] compiler{,-gcc4}.h: Remove duplicate macros Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 6/25] bug.h: Replace __linktime_error with __compiletime_error Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 7/25] compiler{,-gcc4}.h: Introduce __flatten function attribute Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 8/25] bug.h: Make BUILD_BUG_ON generate compile-time error Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:30 ` Daniel Santos [this message]
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/25] bug.h: Add gcc 4.2+ versions of BUILD_BUG_ON_* macros Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/25] rbtree.h: Generic Red-Black Trees Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 12/25] rbtree.h: include kconfig.h Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 13/25] fair.c: Use generic rbtree impl in fair scheduler Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 15/25] kernel-doc: bugfix - multi-line macros Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 16/25] kernel-doc: bugfix - empty line in Example section Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 17/25] kernel-doc: Don't mangle whitespace " Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:31 ` [PATCH v5 19/25] rbtree.h: add doc comments for struct rb_node Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v5 20/25] selftest: Add generic tree self-test common code Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v5 21/25] selftest: Add userspace test program Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v5 22/25] selftest: Add script to compile & run " Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v5 23/25] selftest: Add basic compiler iterator test script Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v5 24/25] selftest: report generation script for test results Daniel Santos
2012-09-25 23:32 ` [PATCH v5 25/25] rbtree.h: (optional?) Add RB_INSERT_DUPE_RIGHT flag Daniel Santos
[not found] ` <1348618742.22822.39.camel@gandalf.local.home>
2012-09-26 1:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees (still WIP) Daniel Santos
2012-09-26 1:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-26 5:07 ` Daniel Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348615859-10259-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--to=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®