mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] cpu-hotplug.txt: fix comments of work_on_cpu()
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:20:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348680043-5077-11-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348680043-5077-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

This is a tiny fix of the comments of work_on_cpu() which is changed
back to use workqueue and it can be run at some time.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
index 66ef8f3..d19c5fd 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ Q: I need to ensure that a particular cpu is not removed when there is some
    work specific to this cpu is in progress.
 A: There are two ways.  If your code can be run in interrupt context, use
    smp_call_function_single(), otherwise use work_on_cpu().  Note that
-   work_on_cpu() is slow, and can fail due to out of memory:
+   work_on_cpu() is slow:
 
 	int my_func_on_cpu(int cpu)
 	{
-- 
1.7.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 17:20 [PATCH 00/12] workqueue: simple cleanups Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] workqueue: add WORKER_RESCUER Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:07   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:11     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] workqueue: disallow set_cpus_allowed_ptr() from work item Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:12   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] workqueue: remove WORKER_PREP from rescuer Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:24   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30  7:39       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: simplify is_chained_work() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:28   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28  9:52     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30  7:32       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] workqueue: don't wake up other workers in rescuer Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:34   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:18     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] workqueue: destroy_worker() can only destory idle worker not just created worker Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:35   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] workqueue: remove WORKER_STARTED Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:36   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28  9:52     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] workqueue: fix comments of insert_work() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] workqueue: declare system_highpri_wq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] workqueue: add WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE to system_long_wq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:38   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28  8:06     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30  7:22       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] workqueue: avoid work_on_cpu() to interfere system_wq Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1348680043-5077-11-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®