From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758405Ab2I1PAX (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:00:23 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:55049 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758393Ab2I1PAV (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:00:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: fix possible missing of device probe From: anish kumar To: Ming Lei Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , stable@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1348793563-19186-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1348842668.1480.9.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:30:05 +0530 Message-ID: <1348844405.1480.19.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 22:44 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:31 PM, anish kumar > wrote: > > > Ming, > > Somehow I feel here that the problem reported by Russell is totally > > different from your understanding of problem.I humbly urge you to have > > I let Russell answer if it is same problem, see my last email. > > > a look at Russell's nice explanation. > > Sorry, how do you know I didn't look at Russell's explanation? Sorry but I just had a cursory glance at your explanation and looks like there was some argument between you and russell so thought about that(shamelessly not even going through the explanation put forward by you as I understood the problem and solution). Anyway as mentioned earlier I am no expert on driver core but just wanted to learn the wonderful driver core design. Hope I didn't offend you. > > > Thanks, > -- > Ming Lei