From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>,
Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] target/file: Re-enable optional fd_buffered_io=1 operation
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:16:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349209004.28145.61.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121001084605.GA23497@infradead.org>
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 04:46 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 05:58:11AM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> >
> > This patch re-adds the ability to optionally run in buffered FILEIO mode
> > (eg: w/o O_DSYNC) for device backends in order to once again use the
> > Linux buffered cache as a write-back storage mechanism.
> >
> > This difference with this patch is that fd_create_virtdevice() now
> > forces the explicit setting of emulate_write_cache=1 when buffered FILEIO
> > operation has been enabled.
>
> What this lacks is a clear reason why you would enable this inherently
> unsafe mode. While there is some clear precedence to allow people doing
> stupid thing I'd least like a rationale for it, and it being documented
> as unsafe.
>
> > + /*
>
> Indention error.
>
Fixed
> > + * Optionally allow fd_buffered_io=1 to be enabled for people
> > + * who know what they are doing w/o O_DSYNC.
> > + */
>
> This comment doesn't explain at all what's going on here. It should be
> something like
>
> /*
> * Unsafe mode allows disabling data integrity by not forcing
> * data out to disk in writethrough cache mode. Only to be used
> * for benchmark cheating or similar purposes.
> */
>
How about the following instead..?
/*
* Optionally allow fd_buffered_io=1 to be enabled for people
* who want use the fs buffer cache as an WriteCache mechanism.
*
* This means that in event of a hard failure, there is a risk
* of silent data-loss if the SCSI client has *not* performed a
* forced unit access (FUA) write, or issued SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE
* to write-out the entire device cache.
*/
> > #define FBDF_HAS_PATH 0x01
> > #define FBDF_HAS_SIZE 0x02
> > +#define FDBD_USE_BUFFERED_IO 0x04
>
> This should be named BDBD_UNSAFE
>
As we are keeping the same fd_buffered_io key=value usage that rtslib
user-space already knows about, how using FDBD_HAS_BUFFERED_IO_WCE
instead for consistency..?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-02 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 5:58 [PATCH 0/6] target: Reenable buffered FILEIO + add iscsi-target MXDSL logic Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] target/file: Re-enable optional fd_buffered_io=1 operation Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-10-01 8:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-02 19:02 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2012-10-02 20:16 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2012-10-03 11:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-04 0:02 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] iscsi-target: Add base MaxXmitDataSegmentLength code Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] iscsi-target: Enable MaxXmitDataSegmentLength operation in login path Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] iscsi-target: Convert incoming PDU payload checks to MaxXmitDataSegmentLength Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] iscsi-target: Add MaxXmitDataSegmentLength connection recovery check Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] iscsi-target: Change iscsi_target_seq_pdu_list.c to honor MaxXmitDataSegmentLength Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349209004.28145.61.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®