From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756700Ab2JERqo (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:46:44 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:30802 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754932Ab2JERql (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:46:41 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fb8vOjsF c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=_Ld--4Lr3LMA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=t9ydKhIB5vYA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=TzeAaOVhAAAA:8 a=vikj0InrG-HBPknX5aYA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=UVEM-Fm2KIoA:10 a=VQ7OGjdcjMoYM5RE:21 a=TrR0jtbbByy9Wq9i:21 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1349459199.6755.66.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality From: Steven Rostedt To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , Frederic Weisbecker Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:46:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <1349253783-21612-7-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1349254399-22742-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1349455743.6755.57.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1349457161.6755.61.camel@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >> > I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? > >> It's introduced by first patch in the series. > > Usually a series has the format of: > > > > [PATCH x/n] .... > > > > Where x is the patch number and n is the total number of patches. I'm > > not sure what a v2.5 is. This is version 2 and a half? > Ah, it's an update to patch 6/6. You could see it by > Message-Id/In-Reply-To chains. > OK, that's where the confusion stems from. The original patch 6/6 had in the patch: Cc: Steven Rostedt (maintainer:TRACING) Cc: Frederic Weisbecker (maintainer:TRACING) But I neither I nor Frederic were on the actual Cc (I had to open my LKML folder to see it). Perhaps whatever tool you used to send the patches got confused by the (maintainer:TRACING) line. Thus, the only thing that ended up in my INBOX was the [PATCHv2.5] one. -- Steve