From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xemul@parallels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] posix timers: allocate timer id per process
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:56:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350633401.2293.245.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121019074912.10745.339.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:50 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> v4:
> 1) a couple of coding style fixes (lines over 80 characters)
>
> v3:
> 1) hash calculation simlified to improve perfomance.
>
> v2:
> 1) Hash table become RCU-friendly. Hash table search now done under RCU lock
> protection.
This should not be in the changelog, only after the --- separator.
> I've tested scalability on KVM with 4 CPU. The testing environment was build
> of 10 processes, each had 512 posix timers running (SIGSEV_NONE) and was
> calling timer_gettime() in loop. With all this stuff being running, I was
> measuring time of calling of syscall timer_gettime() 10000 times.
>
> Without this patch: ~7ms
> With this patch : ~7ms
>
> This patch is required CRIU project (www.criu.org).
> To migrate processes with posix timers we have to make sure, that we can
> restore posix timer with proper id.
> Currently, this is not true, because timer ids are allocated globally.
> So, this is precursor patch and it's purpose is make posix timer id to be
> allocated per process.
>
> Patch replaces global idr with global hash table for posix timers and
> makes timer ids unique not globally, but per task. Next free timer id is type
> of integer and stored on signal struct (posix_timer_id). If free timer id
> reaches negative value on timer creation, it will be dropped to zero and
> -EAGAIN will be returned to user.
I wonder if some applications relied on our idr, assuming they would get
low values for their timer id.
(We could imagine some applications use a table indexed by the timer id)
> Hash table is size of page (4KB).
Only on x86_64. Why not instead saying hashtable has 512 slots ?
> Key is constructed as follows:
> key = hash_32(current->signal) ^ hash_32(posix_timer_id);
This is outdated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> ---
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 7:50 Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-10-19 7:56 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-10-19 9:38 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-10-19 10:43 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350633401.2293.245.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®