From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
To: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>, Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] HW-latency: Differentiate three modes to use CPU carry out testing
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352080784-30839-5-git-send-email-luming.yu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352080784-30839-1-git-send-email-luming.yu@gmail.com>
0: all online cpus
1: any one of online cpus
2: all online cpus sequentially run test
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
---
drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c b/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c
index 8a8c6ba..4303644 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static unsigned long buf_size = 262144UL;
static struct task_struct *kthread;
struct sample {
+ unsigned int cpu;
u64 seqnum;
u64 duration;
struct timespec timestamp;
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ static struct data {
static ktime_t now;
struct sample_function {
const char *name;
+ u8 type; /* 0=all parallel, 1=anyone, 2=all sequential*/
struct list_head list;
int (*get_sample)(void *unused);
};
@@ -186,14 +188,11 @@ static int get_freq_sample(void *unused)
u32 sample = 0;
int ret = 1;
unsigned int cpu_tsc_freq;
- static DEFINE_MUTEX(freq_pit_mutex);
start = ktime_get();
do {
t1 = ktime_get();
- mutex_lock(&freq_pit_mutex);
cpu_tsc_freq = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
- mutex_unlock(&freq_pit_mutex);
t2 = ktime_get();
total = ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(t2, start));
diff = abs(cpu_tsc_freq - tsc_khz);
@@ -249,23 +248,30 @@ out:
struct sample_function tsc_sample = {
.name = "tsc",
+ .type = 0,
.get_sample = get_tsc_sample,
};
struct sample_function tsc_freq_sample = {
.name = "freq",
+ .type = 2,
.get_sample = get_freq_sample,
};
struct sample_function random_bytes_sample = {
.name = "random_bytes",
+ .type = 0,
.get_sample = get_random_bytes_sample,
};
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(testing_cpu_map, NR_CPUS);
+
static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
{
int err = 0;
u64 interval = 0;
+ int cpu;
+ struct cpumask *testing_cpu_mask = to_cpumask(testing_cpu_map);
int (*get_sample)(void *unused);
mutex_lock(&sample_function_mutex);
@@ -274,10 +280,31 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
else
goto out;
+ cpumask_or(testing_cpu_mask, testing_cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
mutex_lock(&data.lock);
-
- err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ switch (current_sample_func->type) {
+ case 0:
+ err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, testing_cpu_mask);
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, NULL);
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
+ cpumask_clear(testing_cpu_mask);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, testing_cpu_mask);
+ err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ mutex_unlock(&data.lock);
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+
if (err) {
mutex_unlock(&data.lock);
goto err_out;
--
1.7.12.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-04 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-05 1:59 [PATCH 00/13] A simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughtput ver 0.10 Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 01/13] HW-latency: hardware latency test 0.10 Luming Yu
2012-11-04 21:07 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-05 12:14 ` Luming Yu
2012-11-04 21:23 ` John Kacur
2012-11-05 12:20 ` Luming Yu
2012-11-05 8:44 ` No recipient
2012-11-05 8:44 ` Ove Karlsen
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 02/13] HW-latency: Fix a lockdep warnning Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 03/13] HW-latency: Use get_random_bytes_arch Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` Luming Yu [this message]
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 05/13] HW-latency: Add CPU field in sample output Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 06/13] HW-latency: cycle through all online cpus to re-test cpufreq Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 07/13] HW-latency: delete too many "Fast TSC calibration using PIT" in cpufreq sampling Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 08/13] HW-latency: A stupid memory scanner for raw memory latency test Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 09/13] HW-latency: Fix unwanted crash caused by write to dummy debugfs interface Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 10/13] HW-latency: add address range for x86-32 Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] HW-latency: fix a warnning in previous patch Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 12/13] HW-latency: Add sample unit in sample data Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] HW-latency: some sample data format change Luming Yu
2012-11-08 16:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] A simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughtput ver 0.10 Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352080784-30839-5-git-send-email-luming.yu@gmail.com \
--to=luming.yu@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luming.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome