From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753932Ab2KLRT7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:19:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:46747 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752786Ab2KLRT6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:19:58 -0500 From: Joonsoo Kim To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim , Alex Shi , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH] x86/tlb: correct vmflag test for checking VM_HUGETLB Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:17:36 +0900 Message-Id: <1352740656-19417-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org commit 611ae8e3f5204f7480b3b405993b3352cfa16662('enable tlb flush range support for x86') change flush_tlb_mm_range() considerably. After this, we test whether vmflag equal to VM_HUGETLB and it may be always failed, because vmflag usually has other flags simultaneously. Our intention is to check whether this vma is for hughtlb, so correct it according to this purpose. Cc: Alex Shi Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c index 0777f04..60f926c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, } if (end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL || tlb_flushall_shift == -1 - || vmflag == VM_HUGETLB) { + || vmflag & VM_HUGETLB) { local_flush_tlb(); goto flush_all; } -- 1.7.9.5