From: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
To: <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: <dedekind1@gmail.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device()
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:43:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353307410-17529-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> (raw)
The nand_get_device() does not select the chip, but nand_release_device()
does de-select the chip. It is really strange.
With the current code, nand_sync() will de-select the chip, even if the chip
has never been selected.
To make the balance of select/de-select chip, it's better to remove the
de-select chip code in nand_release_device() which makes the code more
clear.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 6eef7fb..861a87d 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -130,15 +130,12 @@ static int check_offs_len(struct mtd_info *mtd,
* nand_release_device - [GENERIC] release chip
* @mtd: MTD device structure
*
- * Deselect, release chip lock and wake up anyone waiting on the device.
+ * Release chip lock and wake up anyone waiting on the device.
*/
static void nand_release_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
- /* De-select the NAND device */
- chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
-
/* Release the controller and the chip */
spin_lock(&chip->controller->lock);
chip->controller->active = NULL;
@@ -333,8 +330,10 @@ static int nand_block_bad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, int getchip)
i++;
} while (!res && i < 2 && (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_SCAN2NDPAGE));
- if (getchip)
+ if (getchip) {
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
nand_release_device(mtd);
+ }
return res;
}
@@ -952,6 +951,7 @@ int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
ret = __nand_unlock(mtd, ofs, len, 0);
out:
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
nand_release_device(mtd);
return ret;
@@ -1016,6 +1016,7 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
ret = __nand_unlock(mtd, ofs, len, 0x1);
out:
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
nand_release_device(mtd);
return ret;
@@ -1552,6 +1553,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
}
}
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
ops->retlen = ops->len - (size_t) readlen;
if (oob)
@@ -1806,6 +1808,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
}
}
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
ops->oobretlen = ops->ooblen - readlen;
@@ -2188,8 +2191,10 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
/* Check, if it is write protected */
- if (nand_check_wp(mtd))
- return -EIO;
+ if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
realpage = (int)(to >> chip->page_shift);
page = realpage & chip->pagemask;
@@ -2201,8 +2206,10 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
chip->pagebuf = -1;
/* Don't allow multipage oob writes with offset */
- if (oob && ops->ooboffs && (ops->ooboffs + ops->ooblen > oobmaxlen))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (oob && ops->ooboffs && (ops->ooboffs + ops->ooblen > oobmaxlen)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
while (1) {
int bytes = mtd->writesize;
@@ -2253,6 +2260,9 @@ static int nand_do_write_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
ops->retlen = ops->len - writelen;
if (unlikely(oob))
ops->oobretlen = ops->ooblen;
+
+err_out:
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
return ret;
}
@@ -2379,8 +2389,10 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RESET, -1, -1);
/* Check, if it is write protected */
- if (nand_check_wp(mtd))
+ if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) {
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
return -EROFS;
+ }
/* Invalidate the page cache, if we write to the cached page */
if (page == chip->pagebuf)
@@ -2393,6 +2405,8 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
else
status = chip->ecc.write_oob(mtd, chip, page & chip->pagemask);
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
+
if (status)
return status;
@@ -2625,6 +2639,7 @@ erase_exit:
ret = instr->state == MTD_ERASE_DONE ? 0 : -EIO;
/* Deselect and wake up anyone waiting on the device */
+ chip->select_chip(mtd, -1);
nand_release_device(mtd);
/* Do call back function */
--
1.7.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 6:43 Huang Shijie [this message]
2012-11-19 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: remove the "chip" parameter in nand_get_device() Huang Shijie
2012-11-30 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: remove the de-select chip code in nand_release_device() Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353307410-17529-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com \
--to=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®