From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH review 02/16] userns: Allow unprivileged users to create user namespaces.
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:12:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353337961-12962-2-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353337961-12962-1-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com>
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Now that we have been through every permission check in the kernel
having uid == 0 and gid == 0 in your local user namespace no
longer adds any special privileges. Even having a full set
of caps in your local user namespace is safe because capabilies
are relative to your local user namespace, and do not confer
unexpected privileges.
Over the long term this should allow much more of the kernels
functionality to be safely used by non-root users. Functionality
like unsharing the mount namespace that is only unsafe because
it can fool applications whose privileges are raised when they
are executed. Since those applications have no privileges in
a user namespaces it becomes safe to spoof and confuse those
applications all you want.
Those capabilities will still need to be enabled carefully because
we may still need things like rlimits on the number of unprivileged
mounts but that is to avoid DOS attacks not to avoid fooling root
owned processes.
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 8 --------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 811ffba..8c29abb 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1569,14 +1569,6 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
if (clone_flags & (CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_PARENT))
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWUSER) {
- /* hopefully this check will go away when userns support is
- * complete
- */
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || !capable(CAP_SETUID) ||
- !capable(CAP_SETGID))
- return -EPERM;
- }
/*
* Determine whether and which event to report to ptracer. When
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 15:08 [PATCH review 0/16] user namespace and namespace infrastructure completion Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 01/16] userns: Ignore suid and sgid on binaries if the uid or gid can not be mapped Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 03/16] userns: Allow chown and setgid preservation Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 17:49 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 04/16] userns: Allow setting a userns mapping to your current uid Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 05/16] userns: Allow unprivileged users to create new namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 06/16] userns: Allow unprivileged use of setns Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 07/16] userns: Make create_new_namespaces take a user_ns parameter Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 08/16] userns: Kill task_user_ns Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 22:34 ` Kees Cook
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 09/16] userns: Implent proc namespace operations Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 10/16] userns: Implement unshare of the user namespace Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 11/16] procfs: Print task uids and gids in the userns that opened the proc file Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 17:58 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 12/16] userns: For /proc/self/{uid,gid}_map derive the lower userns from the struct file Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 18:03 ` [PATCH review 12/16] userns: For /proc/self/{uid, gid}_map " Serge Hallyn
2012-11-19 18:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 21:01 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-11-19 21:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 21:19 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-11-19 21:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 13/16] userns: Allow unprivilged mounts of proc and sysfs Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 14/16] proc: Generalize proc inode allocation Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 18:04 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 15/16] proc: Fix the namespace inode permission checks Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 15:12 ` [PATCH review 16/16] proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353337961-12962-2-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®