From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:24:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:24:01 -0500 Received: from mail2.megatrends.com ([155.229.80.11]:10509 "EHLO mail2.megatrends.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:23:57 -0500 Message-ID: <1355693A51C0D211B55A00105ACCFE64E9518D@ATL_MS1> From: Venkatesh Ramamurthy To: "'David Woodhouse'" , Venkatesh Ramamurthy Cc: "'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'Alan Cox'" Subject: RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:19:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It should be possible to read the BIOS setting for this option and > behave accordingly. Please give full details of how to read and interpret > the information stored in the CMOS for all versions of AMI BIOS, and I'll > take a look at this. [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] When i meant BIOS setting option i meant the SCSI BIOS settings not system BIOS option. The two SCSI controllers are of different make. This situation is made worse when the system has many cards of different makes and one of the controller somewhere in the middle of all the slots is made the boot controller. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/