From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752179Ab2LVUV6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:21:58 -0500 Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:60830 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853Ab2LVUV4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:21:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1356207733.10280.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/25] rfkill: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() From: Johannes Berg To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 21:22:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1356141435-17340-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (sfid-20121222_030236_218242_05D0330F) References: <1356141435-17340-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1356141435-17340-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (sfid-20121222_030236_218242_05D0330F) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 17:57 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending > before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary > and quite a few of them are buggy. > > Remove unnecessary pending tests from rfkill. Only compile > tested. Looks fine to me, feel free to route through your tree -- nobody changes rfkill much (famous last words...) :-) johannes