From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752762Ab3ABU3Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:29:24 -0500 Received: from webmail.solarflare.com ([12.187.104.25]:6692 "EHLO webmail.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509Ab3ABU3W (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:29:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1357158557.3652.42.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: cpu_rmap: avoid flushing all workqueues From: Ben Hutchings To: Josh Triplett CC: David Decotigny , , "David S. Miller" , Or Gerlitz , Amir Vadai , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , David Howells , Paul Gortmaker Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:29:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20121229203644.GA31014@leaf> References: <796d4768f46d928c68018f44b369df570a0889c4.1356810877.git.decot@googlers.com> <20121229203644.GA31014@leaf> Organization: Solarflare Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.17.20.137] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-19504.001 X-TM-AS-Result: No--17.736600-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 12:36 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:57:09AM -0800, David Decotigny wrote: > > In some cases, free_irq_cpu_rmap() is called while holding a lock > > (eg. rtnl). This can lead to deadlocks, because it invokes > > flush_scheduled_work() which ends up waiting for whole system > > workqueue to flush, but some pending works might try to acquire the > > lock we are already holding. > > > > This commit uses reference-counting to replace > > irq_run_affinity_notifiers(). It also removes > > irq_run_affinity_notifiers() altogether. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Decotigny > > You might consider adding a cpu_rmap_get to parallel cpu_rmap_put. > > Also, why keep free_cpu_rmap around at this point? As far as I can > tell, it has no callers. > > Otherwise, this looks good to me. I intended to make cpu_rmap usable independently of IRQ notification, although as you note there have been no other users so far. free_cpu_rmap() is now effectively an alias for cpu_rmap_put(), and the latter *does* have a caller. So perhaps cpu_rmap_put() should be extern and the alias dropped. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.