From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753100Ab3ACAj4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:39:56 -0500 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:39485 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753058Ab3ACAjy (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:39:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1357173594.25181.27.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: prefer dev_( to dev_printk(KERN_ From: Joe Perches To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Andrew Morton , Andy Whitcroft , Lance Ortiz , lance_ortiz@hotmail.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, mchehab@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:39:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20130102232730.5706.82243.stgit@grignak.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20130102232743.5706.63153.stgit@grignak.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1357171594.25181.19.camel@joe-AO722> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 18:34 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > Add YA check to printk style. > > > > dev_ uses are functions and generate smaller > > object code than dev_printk(KERN_. [] > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl [] > > @@ -2430,6 +2430,16 @@ sub process { > > "Prefer pr_warn(... to pr_warning(...\n" . $herecurr); > > } > > > > + if ($line =~ /\bdev_printk\s*\(\s*KERN_([A-Z]+)/) { > > + my $orig = $1; > > + my $level = lc($orig); > > + $level = "warn" if ($level eq "warning"); > > + my $level2 = $level; > > + $level2 = "dbg" if ($level eq "debug"); > > + WARN("PREFER_DEV_LEVEL", > > + "Prefer dev_$level2(... to dev_printk(KERN_$orig, ...\n" . $herecurr); > > This suggests dev_dbg() instead of dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG), doesn't it? > Those aren't equivalent (dev_printk() always does the printk, but in > many cases dev_dbg() does not, depending on CONFIG_DEBUG, > CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG, etc.) True, I think the suggested change is appropriate though. If people really want debug output in a specific file, then they should #define DEBUG and/or enable dynamic debug.