From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752920Ab3ADGy6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 01:54:58 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:49397 "EHLO mail-da0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253Ab3ADGyy (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 01:54:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] softirq: reduce latencies From: Eric Dumazet To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Rick Jones , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ben Hutchings In-Reply-To: References: <1357219919.21409.24519.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <50E5DEEF.2080009@hp.com> <1357274510.21409.27807.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:54:51 -0800 Message-ID: <1357282491.21409.28211.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 06:31 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Will you send a v2 with this change...? > > -#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME min(1, (2*HZ/1000)) > +#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME max(1, (2*HZ/1000)) I will, I was planning to do this after waiting for other comments/reviews.