From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756521Ab3ANNuG (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:50:06 -0500 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:57535 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755513Ab3ANNuF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:50:05 -0500 Message-ID: <1358171412.19400.10.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: checkpatch.pl "uninitialized value" From: Joe Perches To: Bernd Petrovitsch Cc: Schrober , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Andrew Morton Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 05:50:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1358171107.15075.89.camel@thorin> References: <8765116.NauFasYmb5@bentobox> <1358171107.15075.89.camel@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 14:45 +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 14:42 +0100, Schrober wrote: > [...] > > it seems the current version of checkpatch.pl in linux-next ist broken. I get > > a lot of > > > > Use of uninitialized value $ms_size in pattern match (m//) at ./scripts/checkpatch.pl line 3383. > on which file? Any file with a usleep_range or a memset > If you would have added the command line to trivially reproduce that (or > whatever you did to get it), people are more likely to look into it. Try this patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/10/444