From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755295Ab3AOEwW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:52:22 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:57019 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046Ab3AOEwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:52:21 -0500 Message-ID: <1358225532.25910.37.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() From: Mike Galbraith To: Michael Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 05:52:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50F4C8AB.6050902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1356588535-23251-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50ED384C.1030301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1357977704.6796.47.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1357985943.6796.55.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1358155290.5631.19.camel@marge.simpson.net> <50F4C8AB.6050902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Vz+5DygFzWxv0QZuklx1PTqo1vDv4hFHpE3oLc4XgK4 WlHF/wz9V2ozhAuuZILDsIQBpay1ZQOhUGY7c2a4YzVG+IlnoC kvOvnF1UMe8yb2tdw1k/ERLDrMtta95WyFKRXYF8g3DqddEMtZ nHpfuW5lyudzaJcufnxeCd087DGmwJSTx4X8l0C9q+RJ9A3Ww9 AfVF0Lt21gjg5srfo6X05JIqAHOnFWu0EIejgeLu3Jxnvgz7mF uwGxP0+gF4DkW0wfSGDzFHCQijteC2bjxNIeAN7DcePKBQqbV1 KDb9US0g3cYDlBSfowUgHSJ28KIi/+CQlKyS7uS/qfFfBqxsSt zRmpV3AuwyLpoUmSbHx7jpLO40EmcpBNbuZMOXM8QJGMqpmBCL IcJLhSAp90Pvw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:10 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > hanks for the testing, could you please tell me which benchmark > generate these results? aim7, using the compute workfile, and a datapoints file containing $Tasks. multitask -nl -f will prompt for the datapoints file. You'll have to bump /proc/sys/kernel/sem if it's left at default by your distro. If you want, I can send you a tarball offline. > I will try to re-base the patch into 3.8-rc3 with consideration of NUMA > domain, I suppose it could fix the below BUG and provide a better results. I don't _think_ you'll fix the sweet spot without setting knobs such that last_buddy can do its thing, but go for it ;-) -Mike