From: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
johnstul@us.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] sched: /proc/sched_debug fails on very very large machines.
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:46:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358286372-13777-3-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358286372-13777-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com>
On systems with 4096 cores attemping to read /proc/sched_debug fails.
We are trying to push all the data into a single kmalloc buffer.
The issue is on these very large machines all the data will not fit in 4mb.
A better solution is to not us the single_open mechanism but to provide
our own seq_operations and treat each cpu as an individual record.
The output should be identical to previous version.
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>)
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
---
kernel/sched/debug.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 6f79596..1ffdd42 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -253,11 +253,11 @@ static void print_cpu(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
unsigned int freq = cpu_khz ? : 1;
- SEQ_printf(m, "\ncpu#%d, %u.%03u MHz\n",
+ SEQ_printf(m, "cpu#%d, %u.%03u MHz\n",
cpu, freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
}
#else
- SEQ_printf(m, "\ncpu#%d\n", cpu);
+ SEQ_printf(m, "cpu#%d\n", cpu);
#endif
#define P(x) \
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ do { \
print_rq(m, rq, cpu);
rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_debug_lock, flags);
+ SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
}
static const char *sched_tunable_scaling_names[] = {
@@ -322,11 +323,10 @@ static const char *sched_tunable_scaling_names[] = {
"linear"
};
-static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+static void sched_debug_header(struct seq_file *m)
{
u64 ktime, sched_clk, cpu_clk;
unsigned long flags;
- int cpu;
local_irq_save(flags);
ktime = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
@@ -368,33 +368,95 @@ static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
#undef PN
#undef P
- SEQ_printf(m, " .%-40s: %d (%s)\n", "sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling",
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-40s: %d (%s)\n",
+ "sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling",
sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling,
sched_tunable_scaling_names[sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling]);
+ SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
+}
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
- print_cpu(m, cpu);
+static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+ int cpu = (unsigned long)(v - 2);
- SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
+ if (cpu != -1)
+ print_cpu(m, cpu);
+ else
+ sched_debug_header(m);
return 0;
}
void sysrq_sched_debug_show(void)
{
- sched_debug_show(NULL, NULL);
+ int cpu;
+
+ sched_debug_header(NULL);
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ print_cpu(NULL, cpu);
+
+}
+
+static void *sched_debug_start(struct seq_file *file, loff_t *offset)
+{
+ unsigned long n = *offset;
+
+ if (n == 0)
+ return (void *) 1;
+
+ n--;
+
+ if (n > 0)
+ n = cpumask_next(n - 1, cpu_online_mask);
+ else
+ n = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
+
+ *offset = n + 1;
+
+ if (n < nr_cpu_ids)
+ return (void *)(unsigned long)(n + 2);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *sched_debug_next(struct seq_file *file, void *data, loff_t *offset)
+{
+ (*offset)++;
+ return sched_debug_start(file, offset);
+}
+
+static void sched_debug_stop(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
+{
+}
+
+
+static const struct seq_operations sched_debug_sops = {
+ .start = sched_debug_start,
+ .next = sched_debug_next,
+ .stop = sched_debug_stop,
+ .show = sched_debug_show,
+};
+
+static int sched_debug_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ seq_release(inode, file);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int sched_debug_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
- return single_open(filp, sched_debug_show, NULL);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = seq_open(filp, &sched_debug_sops);
+
+ return ret;
}
static const struct file_operations sched_debug_fops = {
.open = sched_debug_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
- .release = single_release,
+ .release = sched_debug_release,
};
static int __init init_sched_debug_procfs(void)
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-15 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-15 21:46 [PATCH RESEND 0/4] /proc/schedstat and /proc/sched_debug fail at 4096 Nathan Zimmer
2013-01-15 21:46 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/4] sched: /proc/sched_stat fails on very very large machines Nathan Zimmer
2013-01-16 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17 22:36 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-01-15 21:46 ` Nathan Zimmer [this message]
2013-01-16 21:56 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/4] sched: /proc/sched_debug " Andrew Morton
2013-01-15 21:46 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/4] timer_list: split timer_list_show_tickdevices Nathan Zimmer
2013-01-16 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-15 21:46 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/4] timer_list: Convert timer list to be a proper seq_file Nathan Zimmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358286372-13777-3-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com \
--to=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®