From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756623Ab3AQVoZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:44:25 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:15308 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755864Ab3AQVoX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:44:23 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=O9a7TWBW c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=1dK1Tq4abSwA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=daFlbPKOXuoA:10 a=M9TZjGZPBGT3v9G97LcA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1358459061.23211.47.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match check From: Steven Rostedt To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Christoph Lameter , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , Thomas Gleixner , RT , Clark Williams , John Kacur , "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:44:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1358458583.11051.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1358446258.23211.32.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1358447864.23211.34.camel@gandalf.local.home> <0000013c4a69a2cf-1a19a6f6-e6a3-4f06-99a4-10fdd4b9aca2-000000@email.amazonses.com> <1358458583.11051.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 13:36 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Index: linux/mm/slub.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c 2013-01-15 10:42:08.490183607 -0600 > > +++ linux/mm/slub.c 2013-01-17 15:27:48.973051155 -0600 > > @@ -1993,8 +1993,8 @@ static inline void flush_slab(struct kme > > deactivate_slab(s, c->page, c->freelist); > > > > c->tid = next_tid(c->tid); > > - c->page = NULL; > > c->freelist = NULL; > > + c->page = NULL; > > } > > > > /* > > @@ -2227,8 +2227,8 @@ redo: > > if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) { > > stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH); > > deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist); > > - c->page = NULL; > > c->freelist = NULL; > > + c->page = NULL; > > goto new_slab; > > } > > > > @@ -2239,8 +2239,8 @@ redo: > > */ > > if (unlikely(!pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags))) { > > deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist); > > - c->page = NULL; > > c->freelist = NULL; > > + c->page = NULL; > > goto new_slab; > > } > > > > Without appropriate barriers, this change is a shoot in the dark. Totally agree. -- Steve