From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
<balbi@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drivers/misc/ti-st: remove gpio handling"
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:31:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358890299.6252.166.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130122201453.GR22517@atomide.com>
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 12:14 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com> [130121 03:16]:
> > This reverts commit eccf2979b2c034b516e01b8a104c3739f7ef07d1.
> >
> > The reason is that it broke TI WiLink shared transport on Panda.
> > Also, callback functions should not be added to board files anymore,
> > so revert to implementing the power functions in the driver itself.
> >
> > Additionally, changed a variable name ('status' to 'err') so that this
> > revert compiles properly.
> >
> > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.7]
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
>
> This also makes sense from converting to DT based boot as the GPIO
> calls should happen in the driver. Those mdelays probably can be fixed,
> but since this is a revert to a known working version:
I thought about checking exactly what we need as delays and whether we
really need to do all that toggling. At least in some boards, the
toggles are not needed, but I don't know for sure whether it works in
all different variations of the chip, so I kept them to be safe. Also,
I tried to deviate as little as possible from a plain revert, since I'd
like to get this into stable as well.
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Thanks!
--
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-21 11:12 Luciano Coelho
2013-01-22 20:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-01-22 21:31 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2013-01-23 9:04 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-23 9:05 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-23 9:14 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-01-23 9:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-01-23 9:28 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358890299.6252.166.camel@cumari.coelho.fi \
--to=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®