From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] ima: enforcing appraise type
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:07:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358892454-25045-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
The IMA-appraisal extension added local integrity validation and
enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an
extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating
'security.ima' were hash and digital signature based.
Missing is the ability to specify the validation method required. This
patch set addresses this omission, by defining a new policy option
'appraise_type='.
As a result of this change, appraisal rules can now be written on a
per hook basis, resulting in different appraisal status results. The
'ima_appraise_tcb' policy appraises all files owned by root. A new
hook specific rule could specify that all kernel modules, for example,
require a digital signature.
This patchset defines the 'appraise_type' option and caches the
appraisal result on a per hook basis.
Changelog v2:
- Minor cleanup as described in patch descriptions
Mimi
Dmitry Kasatkin (1):
ima: added policy support for 'security.ima' type
Mimi Zohar (3):
ima: increase iint flag size
ima: per hook cache integrity appraisal status
ima: differentiate appraise status only for hook specific rules
Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 4 +-
security/integrity/iint.c | 10 ++++-
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 13 +++++-
security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 25 +++++++-----
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++-
security/integrity/integrity.h | 48 +++++++++++++++-------
7 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.rc3
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 22:07 Mimi Zohar [this message]
2013-01-22 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ima: added policy support for 'security.ima' type Mimi Zohar
2013-01-30 21:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-30 22:42 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-01-31 18:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-31 19:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-01-31 19:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-01-22 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ima: increase iint flag size Mimi Zohar
2013-01-22 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: per hook cache integrity appraisal status Mimi Zohar
2013-01-22 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ima: differentiate appraise status only for hook specific rules Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358892454-25045-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®