From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.shi@intel.com
Subject: [ RFC patch 0/4]: use runnable load avg in cfs balance instead of instant load
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:30:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358998243-23176-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> (raw)
This patchset can be used, but causes burst waking benchmark aim9 drop 5~7%
on my 2 sockets machine. The reason is too light runnable load in early stage
of waked tasks cause imbalance in balancing.
So, it is immature and just a reference for guys who want to go gurther.
Thanks!
Alex
[PATCH 1/4] sched: update cpu load after task_tick.
[PATCH 2/4] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task
[PATCH 3/4] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks
[PATCH 4/4] sched: consider runnable load average in effective_load
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 3:30 Alex Shi [this message]
2013-01-24 3:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: update cpu load after task_tick Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2013-01-24 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-24 15:16 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-25 1:03 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: consider runnable load average in effective_load Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358998243-23176-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®