mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aquini@redhat.com,
	walken@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, lwoodman@redhat.com,
	knoel@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff w/ auto tuning
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:10:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359205815.22942.14.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130126120509.GD13445@gmail.com>

On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 13:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: 
> * Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 14:05 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > 
> > > The performance issue observed with AIM7 is still a mystery.
> > 
> > Hm.  AIM7 mystery _may_ be the same crud I see on a 4 node 40 
> > core box. Stock scheduler knobs are too preempt happy, produce 
> > unstable results. I twiddle them as below to stabilize 
> > results.
> > 
> > I'm testing a load balancing series from Alex Shi with AIM7 
> > and whatnot, added your series on top of it and retested.  
> > What I see is improvement.
> 
> Since we want both series that's good news, agreed?

Yes, both look good.

BTW, the balance and powersaving low end improvements in the Alex set
are not due to any select_idle_sibling() misbehavior as one might
suspect when looking at the set, it's innocent (this time), it's the
balancing policies themselves.  I don't see where it comes from, gotta
be some turbo thingy methinks, but who cares, better is better.

-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-26 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25 19:05 Rik van Riel
2013-01-25 19:16 ` [PATCH -v4 1/5] x86,smp: move waiting on contended ticket lock out of line Rik van Riel
2013-01-25 19:17 ` [PATCH -v4 2/5] x86,smp: proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks Rik van Riel
2013-01-25 19:17 ` [PATCH -v4 3/5] x86,smp: auto tune spinlock backoff delay factor Rik van Riel
2013-01-26 12:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-25 19:18 ` [PATCH -v4 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashed spinlock address Rik van Riel
2013-01-27 13:04   ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-02-06 20:10     ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-09 23:50       ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-01-25 19:19 ` [PATCH -v4 5/5] x86,smp: limit spinlock delay on virtual machines Rik van Riel
2013-01-26 12:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-26 12:47     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 13:50       ` Rik van Riel
2013-02-04 14:02         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-06 17:05           ` Rik van Riel
2013-01-28 18:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-01-25 19:20 ` [DEBUG PATCH -v4 6/5] x86,smp: add debugging code to track spinlock delay value Rik van Riel
2013-01-26  7:21 ` [PATCH -v4 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff w/ auto tuning Mike Galbraith
2013-01-26 12:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-26 13:10     ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2013-01-28  6:49 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-02-03 15:28 ` Chegu Vinod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359205815.22942.14.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=knoel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®