[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: Rearrange locking in rcu_start_gp()

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>

If CPUs are to give prior notice of needed grace periods, it will be
necessary to invoke rcu_start_gp() without dropping the root rcu_node
structure's ->lock.  This commit takes a first step in this direction
by moving the release of this lock to the end of rcu_start_gp().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |    6 ++----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 7b1d776..2c6a931 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1521,16 +1521,14 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 		return;
 	}
-
 	rsp->gp_flags = RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT;
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* Interrupts remain disabled. */
 
 	/* Ensure that CPU is aware of completion of last grace period. */
-	rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	__rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp->mynode, rdp);
 
 	/* Wake up rcu_gp_kthread() to start the grace period. */
 	wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.8