From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, acme@redhat.com, eranian@google.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Add PEBSv2 record support
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:54:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359770064-6344-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359770064-6344-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Add support for the v2 PEBS format. It has a superset of the v1 PEBS
fields, but has a longer record so we need to adjust the code paths.
The main advantage is the new "EventingRip" support which directly
gives the instruction, not off-by-one instruction. So with precise == 2
we use that directly and don't try to use LBRs and walking basic blocks.
This lowers the overhead significantly.
Some other features are added in later patches.
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 6774c17..c95290a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
* check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
* whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
*/
- if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1) {
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 826054a..9d0dae0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ struct pebs_record_nhm {
u64 status, dla, dse, lat;
};
+struct pebs_record_v2 {
+ struct pebs_record_nhm nhm;
+ u64 eventingrip;
+ u64 tsx_tuning;
+};
+
void init_debug_store_on_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct debug_store *ds = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu).ds;
@@ -559,8 +565,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
{
/*
* We cast to pebs_record_core since that is a subset of
- * both formats and we don't use the other fields in this
- * routine.
+ * both formats.
*/
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct pebs_record_core *pebs = __pebs;
@@ -588,7 +593,10 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
regs.bp = pebs->bp;
regs.sp = pebs->sp;
- if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(®s))
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2) {
+ regs.ip = ((struct pebs_record_v2 *)pebs)->eventingrip;
+ regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ } else if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(®s))
regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
else
regs.flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
@@ -641,35 +649,21 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs)
__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, at);
}
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_common(struct pt_regs *iregs, void *at,
+ void *top)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
- struct pebs_record_nhm *at, *top;
struct perf_event *event = NULL;
u64 status = 0;
- int bit, n;
-
- if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
- return;
-
- at = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
- top = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
+ int bit;
ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
- n = top - at;
- if (n <= 0)
- return;
+ for ( ; at < top; at += x86_pmu.pebs_record_size) {
+ struct pebs_record_nhm *p = at;
- /*
- * Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
- * set a reset value.
- */
- WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events, "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
-
- for ( ; at < top; at++) {
- for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&at->status, x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) {
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&p->status, x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) {
event = cpuc->events[bit];
if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
continue;
@@ -692,6 +686,61 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
}
}
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
+{
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
+ struct pebs_record_nhm *at, *top;
+ int n;
+
+ if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
+ return;
+
+ at = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
+ top = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
+
+ ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
+
+ n = top - at;
+ if (n <= 0)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
+ * set a reset value.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events,
+ "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
+
+ return intel_pmu_drain_pebs_common(iregs, at, top);
+}
+
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_v2(struct pt_regs *iregs)
+{
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
+ struct pebs_record_v2 *at, *top;
+ int n;
+
+ if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
+ return;
+
+ at = (struct pebs_record_v2 *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
+ top = (struct pebs_record_v2 *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
+
+ n = top - at;
+ if (n <= 0)
+ return;
+ /*
+ * Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
+ * set a reset value.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events,
+ "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
+
+ return intel_pmu_drain_pebs_common(iregs, at, top);
+}
+
/*
* BTS, PEBS probe and setup
*/
@@ -723,6 +772,12 @@ void intel_ds_init(void)
x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm;
break;
+ case 2:
+ printk(KERN_CONT "PEBS fmt2%c, ", pebs_type);
+ x86_pmu.pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_record_v2);
+ x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_v2;
+ break;
+
default:
printk(KERN_CONT "no PEBS fmt%d%c, ", format, pebs_type);
x86_pmu.pebs = 0;
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-02 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-02 1:54 Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v3 Andi Kleen
2013-02-02 1:54 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2013-02-03 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Add PEBSv2 record support Ingo Molnar
2013-02-02 1:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PMU support v4 Andi Kleen
2013-02-02 1:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PEBS " Andi Kleen
2013-02-02 1:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Support full width counting Andi Kleen
2013-02-02 1:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Move NMI clearing to end of PMI handler after the counter registers are reset Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359770064-6344-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome