Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dma: fix dma_max_pfn()

[Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>]

Hi,

On 12/09/16 14:38, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Santosh & Russell,
> 
> On 19/08/16 19:38, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>
>> On 8/19/2016 12:30 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Hi Santosh,
>>>
>>
>>>>> So I'm 99.9% convinced that the proposed change is correct.
>>>>>
>>>> I will got with that then :-) and take my objection back. Just
>>>> saying that if there other breakages which I can't recollect now,
>>>> those drivers needs to be patched as well.
>>>>
>>> I was able to boot the Keystone2 Edison EVM over NFS with the $subject patch.
>>> Boot log is below. Do you see anything suspicious?
>>>
>> Logs looks ok to me. Probably do some tests where DMA and bounce buffers etc gets tested. Running it through your internal regression
>> suit will be good idea as well if thats possible.
>>
> 
> This has been running in our internal test suite for a week on various TI
> platforms. There haven't been any surprises.
> 
> Is it a good idea to at least put this in -next for a wider test audience?

Gentle reminder.

regards,
-roger