mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Unthrottle the highest RT task of the rq if there are no another available tasks to be picked
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:06:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360652809.4657.87.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2260671360618316@web22h.yandex.ru>

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:31 +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote: 
> It's possible a situation when rq->rt is throttled or
> it has no child entities and there are RT tasks ready
> for execution in the rq which are the only tasks
> of TASK_RUNNING state. In this case pick_next_task
> takes idle tasks and idle wastes cpu time.

That's not a waste of CPU time, that's utilization enforcement the thing
it is designed to do.  I'd rather see borrowing go away, bodyguard being
either a ruthless thug who may save your bacon, or unemployed.  AFAIKT,
the throttle is useless in any other role, just having it standing
around glaring across the room occasionally can turn sensitive realtime
into a quaking heap of jello.

-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11 21:31 Kirill Tkhai
2013-02-12  7:06 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2013-02-12  8:12   ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-02-12 12:15     ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-12 14:46   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1360652809.4657.87.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome