From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933793Ab3BMMz6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:55:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:45978 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932549Ab3BMMz4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:55:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1360760152.24917.33.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ia64 tree with Linus' tree From: Matt Fleming To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "Luck, Tony" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Seiji Aguchi Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:55:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20130213130559.dd6b2ac2c59093cc1794f41b@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20130213130559.dd6b2ac2c59093cc1794f41b@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Registered No. 1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the ia64 tree got a conflict in > drivers/firmware/efivars.c between commit 83e68189745a ("efi: Make > 'efi_enabled' a function to query EFI facilities") from the tree and > commit a93bc0c6e07e ("efi_pstore: Introducing workqueue updating sysfs") > from the ia64 tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Thanks Stephen, this is all correct.