From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.shi@intel.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Subject: [patch v5 09/15] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:07:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361164062-20111-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361164062-20111-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
This patch add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake. It try to
select cpu from the busiest while still has utilization group. That's
will save power since it leaves more groups idle in system.
The trade off is adding a power aware statistics collection in group
seeking. But since the collection just happened in power scheduling
eligible condition, the worst case of hackbench testing just drops
about 2% with powersaving/balance policy. No clear change for
performance policy.
The main function in this patch is get_cpu_for_power_policy(), that
will try to get a idlest cpu from the busiest while still has
utilization group, if the system is using power aware policy and
has such group.
I had tried to use rq utilisation in this balancing, but since the
utilisation need much time to accumulate itself(345ms). It's bad for
any burst balancing. So I use instant rq utilisation -- nr_running.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 287582b..b172678 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3362,26 +3362,134 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
unsigned int group_utils; /* sum utilizations of group */
};
+static inline int
+fix_small_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *group);
+
+/*
+ * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the group.
+ */
+static void get_sg_power_stats(struct sched_group *group,
+ struct sched_domain *sd, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+
+ sgs->group_utils += rq->nr_running;
+ }
+
+ sgs->group_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->sgp->power,
+ SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
+ if (!sgs->group_capacity)
+ sgs->group_capacity = fix_small_capacity(sd, group);
+ sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the domain.
+ */
+static void get_sd_power_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ struct sched_group *group;
+ struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
+ int sd_min_delta = INT_MAX;
+ int cpu = task_cpu(p);
+
+ group = sd->groups;
+ do {
+ long g_delta;
+ unsigned long threshold;
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_group_mask(group)))
+ continue;
+
+ memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
+ get_sg_power_stats(group, sd, &sgs);
+
+ if (sched_balance_policy == SCHED_POLICY_POWERSAVING)
+ threshold = sgs.group_weight;
+ else
+ threshold = sgs.group_capacity;
+
+ g_delta = threshold - sgs.group_utils;
+
+ if (g_delta > 0 && g_delta < sd_min_delta) {
+ sd_min_delta = g_delta;
+ sds->group_leader = group;
+ }
+
+ sds->sd_utils += sgs.group_utils;
+ sds->total_pwr += group->sgp->power;
+ } while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
+
+ sds->sd_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(sds->total_pwr,
+ SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Execute power policy if this domain is not full.
+ */
+static inline int get_sd_sched_balance_policy(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ int cpu, struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ unsigned long threshold;
+
+ if (sched_balance_policy == SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+
+ memset(sds, 0, sizeof(*sds));
+ get_sd_power_stats(sd, p, sds);
+
+ if (sched_balance_policy == SCHED_POLICY_POWERSAVING)
+ threshold = sd->span_weight;
+ else
+ threshold = sds->sd_capacity;
+
+ /* still can hold one more task in this domain */
+ if (sds->sd_utils < threshold)
+ return sched_balance_policy;
+
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+}
+
+/*
+ * If power policy is eligible for this domain, and it has task allowed cpu.
+ * we will select CPU from this domain.
+ */
+static int get_cpu_for_power_policy(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ int policy;
+ int new_cpu = -1;
+
+ policy = get_sd_sched_balance_policy(sd, cpu, p, sds);
+ if (policy != SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && sds->group_leader)
+ new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(sds->group_leader, p, cpu);
+
+ return new_cpu;
+}
+
/*
- * sched_balance_self: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
+ * select_task_rq_fair: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
* that have the 'flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_FORK and
* SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
*
- * Balance, ie. select the least loaded group.
- *
* Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
*
* preempt must be disabled.
*/
static int
-select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
+select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
int new_cpu = cpu;
int want_affine = 0;
- int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
+ int sync = flags & WF_SYNC;
+ struct sd_lb_stats sds;
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
@@ -3407,11 +3515,20 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
break;
}
- if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
+ if (tmp->flags & sd_flag) {
sd = tmp;
+
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+ }
}
if (affine_sd) {
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(affine_sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+
if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
prev_cpu = cpu;
--
1.7.12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-18 5:07 [patch v5 0/15] power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 01/15] sched: set initial value for runnable avg of sched entities Alex Shi
2013-02-18 8:28 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-18 9:16 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 02/15] sched: set initial load avg of new forked task Alex Shi
2013-02-20 6:20 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-24 10:57 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-25 6:00 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-28 7:03 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-25 7:12 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 03/15] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 04/15] sched: add sched balance policies in kernel Alex Shi
2013-02-20 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 13:40 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-21 1:43 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 05/15] sched: add sysfs interface for sched_balance_policy selection Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 06/15] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Alex Shi
2013-02-20 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:09 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-20 13:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:36 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 14:33 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 1:35 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-25 2:26 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-22 8:49 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 12:19 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-20 12:39 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 07/15] sched: add new sg/sd_lb_stats fields for incoming fork/exec/wake balancing Alex Shi
2013-02-20 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:27 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 08/15] sched: move sg/sd_lb_stats struct ahead Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-02-20 9:42 ` [patch v5 09/15] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:09 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:23 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-21 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 14:40 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-22 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-24 9:27 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-24 9:49 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-24 11:55 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-24 17:51 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-25 2:23 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-25 3:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-25 9:53 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-25 10:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 10/15] sched: packing transitory tasks in wake/exec power balancing Alex Shi
2013-02-18 8:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-18 8:56 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 5:55 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 7:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-20 8:11 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 8:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-20 8:54 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 11/15] sched: add power/performance balance allow flag Alex Shi
2013-02-20 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:04 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:08 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 13:52 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 12:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-20 14:20 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-21 1:32 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-21 9:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-21 14:52 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 12/15] sched: pull all tasks from source group Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 13/15] sched: no balance for prefer_sibling in power scheduling Alex Shi
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 14/15] sched: power aware load balance Alex Shi
2013-03-20 4:57 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-21 7:43 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-21 8:41 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-21 9:27 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-21 10:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-22 1:30 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-22 5:14 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-25 4:52 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-29 12:42 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-29 13:39 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 11:25 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-30 14:04 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 15:31 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-18 5:07 ` [patch v5 15/15] sched: lazy power balance Alex Shi
2013-02-18 7:44 ` [patch v5 0/15] power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2013-02-19 12:08 ` Paul Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1361164062-20111-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®