From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S935599Ab3BTDQb (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:16:31 -0500
Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:31573 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S934185Ab3BTDQ2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:16:28 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,699,1355068800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="6732536"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] acpi: move x86/mm/srat.c to
 x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c
From: li guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191902470.18957@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <1360894992-14818-1-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <1360894992-14818-2-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191320410.6322@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	 <1361324355.7859.35.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <1361325113.7859.37.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191802490.14999@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	 <1361326913.7859.41.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <1361327201.7859.44.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191902470.18957@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:16:36 +0800
Message-ID: <1361330196.7859.51.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at
 2013/02/20 11:15:46,
	Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at
 2013/02/20 11:15:47,
	Serialize complete at 2013/02/20 11:15:47
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

在 2013-02-19二的 19:04 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
> 
> > > > No, it doesn't.  From next-20130219, you're missing at least two patches:
> > > > 
> > > > 3795e4893203 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: extend movablemem_map ranges to the end of node")
> > > > 9a561f4dfd70 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: support getting hotplug info from SRAT")
> > > > 
> > > > I'm trying to be patient in reviewing your patches, but please double 
> > > > check your work.
> > > 
> > > I have to say my latest pull has these commit, and can apply
> > > successfully.
> > > really don't know why you can't apply.
> 
> You should not be pulling linux-next, you should be fetching.
> > 
> > I mean although my patches did not based on latest linux-next(miss
> > several commits), but as I can see, they can be applied to latest
> > linux-next (tag next-20130218) successfully.
> > 
> 
> next-20130218 is not the latest linux-next as I've already said.  Do this: 
> go to 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next-history.git;a=blob_plain;f=arch/x86/mm/srat.c;hb=HEAD 
> and search for handle_movablemem().  That's one of the functions added in 
> one of the commits I mentioned and was from February.  Now search your 
> patch for handle_movablemem().  See a problem?

Yes, I know there's no new changes in my patch as I said before(not
based on lasted), but as I try to apply my patch(1/4), it will do
the right work to move current srat.c from arch/x86/mm/ to
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/ regardless of what I based is not latest.