From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756786Ab3BVOVh (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:21:37 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:39752 "EHLO mail-da0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755734Ab3BVOVf (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:21:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1361542891.3683.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats From: Eric Dumazet To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:21:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1361542150.26780.64.camel@laptop> References: <1361512604-2720-1-git-send-email-khilman@linaro.org> <1361522767.26780.44.camel@laptop> <20130222125019.GC17948@somewhere.redhat.com> <1361542150.26780.64.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 15:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Argh!! at what cost? 64bit atomics are like expensive. Wouldn't > > adding > > > a seqlock be saner? > > > > Not sure. This requires a spinlock in the write side which is called > > from > > fast path like the timer interrupt. > > A single spinlock is _way_ cheaper than a ton of cmpxchg8b()s to update > a few variables. We also have include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h since 2.6.36