From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759765Ab3BYDCK (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:02:10 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:58231 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759600Ab3BYDCJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:02:09 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,730,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="260909110" Message-ID: <1361761314.2303.9.camel@rzhang1-mobl4> Subject: Re: [PATCH] acerhdf: Fix fan activation with new thermal governor From: Zhang Rui To: Peter Feuerer Cc: Borislav Petkov , LKML , Durgadoss R , Borislav Petkov , Andreas Mohr , Alexander Lam Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:01:54 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20130222111521.GA25473@pd.tnic> <1361647210-12983-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20130224112851.GA19609@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 12:42 +0100, Peter Feuerer wrote: > Hi Boris, > > thanks for your best wishes in the last mail, I'm feeling little better now. > > Borislav Petkov writes: > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 08:20:10PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> From: Borislav Petkov > >> > >> The new step_wise thermal governor wasn't able to handle the one-trip > >> point design of acerhdf where we want to turn off the fan if we go under > >> the 'fanoff' temperature and to turn it on only after exceeding the > >> 'fanon' temperature. > >> > >> Do that by looking at the current fan state and return the temperature > >> accordingly. > >> > >> Suggested-by: Zhang Rui > >> Cc: Peter Feuerer > >> Cc: Andreas Mohr > >> Cc: Alexander Lam > >> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > > > > Ok, ignore this one for now - the suspend/resume path doesn't pan out > > somehow, need to do some more handholding here. > > Please test my last patch with the 4 trip points ;) - even if you don't > really like it, it is working great! - And to be honest, I still prefer this > solution! > well, the 4 trip points do not make sense, at least the passive trip point is a no op as we have no passive cooling device binded with it. thanks, rui