From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752229Ab3B1KHG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:07:06 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:62808 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158Ab3B1KHC (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:07:02 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+W7kR2PqeWzo0HJ9hvabGNdSlMojPUPRX+olGhYx uUzJToXy8XBlo1 Message-ID: <1362046013.4460.195.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy From: Mike Galbraith To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Michael Wang , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , Alex Shi , Andrew Morton , Ram Pai , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:06:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87hakwssc9.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> References: <512EFB4B.5040204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87hakwssc9.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Not sure if it should require bidirectional relationship. Looks like > just for benchmarks. Isn't there a one-way relationship that could get > a benefit from this? I don't know ;-) ?? Meaningful relationships are bare minimum bidirectional, how can you describe one connection and have it remain meaningful? I love "her" is unlikely to lead to anything meaningful if "she" doesn't know you exist. -Mike