From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH LINUX v5] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:45:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362455124.8941.19.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130305030436.GA18040@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 03:04 +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:45:33AM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 02/20/2013 05:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On ARM we want these to be the same size on 32- and 64-bit.
> > >
> > > This is an ABI change on ARM. X86 does not change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > > Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> > > Cc: Keir (Xen.org) <keir@xen.org>
> > > Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm seeing some some build failures on randconfig builds with this change:
> >
> > /tmp/ccJaIZOW.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/ccJaIZOW.s:831: Error: even register required -- `ldrexd r5,r6,[r4]'
> >
> > This is with ubuntu 12.04 cross compiler (gcc version 4.6.3
> > (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)).
> >
> > This register restriction is on ARM, but not Thumb builds. Comparing
> > this to atomic64_cmpxchg, I don't see how to fix this. Perhaps Will or
> > Nico have thoughts.
>
> [...]
>
> > > + asm volatile("@ xchg_xen_ulong\n"
> > > + "1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
> > > + " strexd %1, %2, %H2, [%3]\n"
> > > + " teq %1, #0\n"
> > > + " bne 1b"
> > > + : "=&r" (oldval), "=&r" (tmp)
> > > + : "r" (val), "r" (ptr)
> > > + : "memory", "cc");
>
> I also can't immediately see why GCC would allocate oldval to an odd base
> register. Can you share your .config please?
I fixed something along these lines before v5 of this patch, although I
must confess I don't recall what it was that I changed (and looking at
the older versions of the patch isn't giving me any clues). I can't
reproduce it now though :-(
I'm using the 4.6.3 cross compiler from kernel.org:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-19 14:48 [PATCH V2] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH LINUX] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 17:17 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:26 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-19 17:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH XEN] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 16:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-21 17:16 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 18:43 ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-22 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22 8:55 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-19 17:27 ` [PATCH LINUX v3] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:29 ` [PATCH LINUX v4] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 18:12 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 18:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 2:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 3:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 9:13 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-20 11:48 ` [PATCH LINUX v5] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-04 2:45 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05 3:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 3:45 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2013-03-05 6:55 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05 7:03 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 8:08 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 9:29 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-07 3:17 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-07 7:17 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 3:56 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 14:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362455124.8941.19.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome