From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756201Ab3CER1I (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:27:08 -0500 Received: from webmail.solarflare.com ([12.187.104.25]:64620 "EHLO webmail.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755179Ab3CER1H (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:27:07 -0500 Message-ID: <1362504410.2791.44.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] ixgbe: Add support for ndo_ll_poll From: Ben Hutchings To: Eliezer Tamir CC: , , Dave Miller , Jesse Brandeburg , , Willem de Bruijn , Andi Kleen , HPA , Eliezer Tamir Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:26:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20130227175606.10611.55498.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com> References: <20130227175549.10611.82188.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com> <20130227175606.10611.55498.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com> Organization: Solarflare Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.17.20.137] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-19688.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.327700-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 09:56 -0800, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > Add the ixgbe driver code implementing ndo_ll_poll. > It should be easy for other drivers to do something similar > in order to enable support for CONFIG_INET_LL_RX_POLL Yes... in fact I wonder whether the lock and state couldn't be added to napi_struct instead of being driver-specific. [...] > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c [...] > static void ixgbe_napi_disable_all(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter) > { > int q_idx; > > - for (q_idx = 0; q_idx < adapter->num_q_vectors; q_idx++) > + local_bh_disable(); /* for ixgbe_qv_lock_napi() */ > + for (q_idx = 0; q_idx < adapter->num_q_vectors; q_idx++) { > napi_disable(&adapter->q_vector[q_idx]->napi); > + while (!ixgbe_qv_lock_napi(adapter->q_vector[q_idx])) { > + pr_info("QV %d locked\n", q_idx); > + msleep(1); > + } > + } > + local_bh_enable(); > } Sleeping with preemption disabled? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.