From: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
To: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
adrian.m.negreanu@intel.com, Torsten.Polle@gmx.de
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer->ret_handler()
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:00:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365004839-21982-2-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365004839-21982-1-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com>
Enclose return probes implementation, introduce ->ret_handler() and update
existing code to rely on ->handler() *and* ->ret_handler() for uprobe and
uretprobe respectively.
v1 changes:
* add bp_vaddr argument to ->ret_handler()
RFCv5 changes:
* don't remove uprobe in case there are no uprobe consumer(handler),
see handler_chain() changes.
RFCv3 changes: (the patch is introduced in v3)
* check whether at least one of the consumer's handlers were set.
* a 'TODO' cap that will be removed once return probes be implemented.
* introduce ->ret_handler().
Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 3 +++
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 02b83db..4042cad 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ enum uprobe_filter_ctx {
struct uprobe_consumer {
int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs);
+ int (*ret_handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
+ unsigned long func,
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx,
struct mm_struct *mm);
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 21d8a65..27c964b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -815,6 +815,14 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
struct uprobe *uprobe;
int ret;
+ /* Uprobe must have at least one set consumer */
+ if (!uc->handler && !uc->ret_handler)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* TODO: Implement return probes */
+ if (uc->ret_handler)
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
/* Racy, just to catch the obvious mistakes */
if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1473,10 +1481,13 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
- int rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
+ int rc = 0;
- WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK,
- "bad rc=0x%x from %pf()\n", rc, uc->handler);
+ if (uc->handler) {
+ rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
+ WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK,
+ "bad rc=0x%x from %pf()\n", rc, uc->handler);
+ }
remove &= rc;
}
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 16:00 [PATCH v1 0/9] uretprobes: Return uprobes implementation Anton Arapov
2013-04-03 16:00 ` Anton Arapov [this message]
2013-04-07 11:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer->ret_handler() Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] uretprobes: Reserve the first slot in xol_vma for trampoline Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 11:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-09 14:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] uretprobes/x86: Hijack return address Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 11:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] uretprobes/ppc: " Anton Arapov
2013-04-04 3:31 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-04-07 11:51 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] uretprobes: Return probe entry, prepare_uretprobe() Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 11:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] uretprobes: Return probe exit, invoke handlers Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 10:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-09 14:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-09 20:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-13 10:01 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-13 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] uretprobes: Limit the depth of return probe nestedness Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] uretprobes: Remove -ENOSYS as return probes implemented Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 11:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] uretprobes: Documentation update Anton Arapov
2013-04-07 11:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-04-03 17:45 ` [PATCH v1 0/9] uretprobes: Return uprobes implementation Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-04 3:32 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365004839-21982-2-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com \
--to=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=Torsten.Polle@gmx.de \
--cc=adrian.m.negreanu@intel.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome