From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it to kernel
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:33:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365600803.27868.60.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364278799-37285-5-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:19 +0000, Jason Wang wrote:
> Currently, for the packets receives from netback, before doing header check,
> kernel just reset the transport header in netif_receive_skb() which pretends non
> l4 header. This is suboptimal for precise packet length estimation (introduced
> in 1def9238: net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation) which needs correct l4
> header for gso packets.
>
> The patch just reuse the header probed by netback for partial checksum packets
> and tries to use skb_flow_dissect() for other cases, if both fail, just pretend
> no l4 header.
>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index aa28550..fc8faa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include <linux/udp.h>
>
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> +#include <net/flow_keys.h>
>
> #include <xen/xen.h>
> #include <xen/events.h>
> @@ -1184,6 +1185,7 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
> goto out;
>
> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
> skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
Should the use of th here (and perhaps above) be replaced with
skb_transport_header() too?
> switch (iph->protocol) {
> case IPPROTO_TCP:
> @@ -1495,6 +1497,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>
> skb->dev = vif->dev;
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev);
> + skb_reset_network_header(skb);
>
> if (checksum_setup(vif, skb)) {
> netdev_dbg(vif->dev,
> @@ -1503,6 +1506,15 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
> continue;
> }
>
> + if (!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) {
> + struct flow_keys keys;
> +
> + if (skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
> + else
> + skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
> + }
> +
> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 6:19 [net-next 0/5] set transport header for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 1/5] macvtap: set transport header before passing skb to lower device Jason Wang
2013-03-26 15:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-27 3:12 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 2/5] tuntap: set transport header before passing it to kernel Jason Wang
2013-03-26 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 3/5] packet: set transport header before doing xmit Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it to kernel Jason Wang
2013-04-10 13:33 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2013-04-11 6:37 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 5/5] net_sched: better precise estimation on packet length for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-26 16:45 ` [net-next 0/5] set transport header " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365600803.27868.60.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®