mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] xen-netback: switch to use skb_partial_csum_set()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:03:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365667420.27868.125.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51666D28.7090500@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 08:58 +0100, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 03:46 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 07:35 +0100, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> Switch to use skb_partial_csum_set() to simplify the codes.
> > This is incremental on top of your previous patch, right?
> 
> It's an independent patch, since the previous patch has been applied.
> >> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> Note:
> >> - Compile test only.
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
> >>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> >> index 83905a9..70631f0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> >> @@ -1156,7 +1156,6 @@ static int netbk_set_skb_gso(struct xenvif *vif,
> >>  static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct iphdr *iph;
> >> -	unsigned char *th;
> >>  	int err = -EPROTO;
> >>  	int recalculate_partial_csum = 0;
> >>  
> >> @@ -1180,28 +1179,26 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  
> >>  	iph = (void *)skb->data;
> >> -	th = skb->data + 4 * iph->ihl;
> >> -	if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
> >> -		goto out;
> >> -
> >> -	skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
> > Is removing this line really correct?
> 
> After commit e5d5deca (net: core: let skb_partial_csum_set() set
> transport header), this work was done by skb_partial_csum_set().

Ah, my working tree must be out of date, thanks.

> >
> >> -	skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
> >>  	switch (iph->protocol) {
> >>  	case IPPROTO_TCP:
> >> -		skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> >> +		if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
> >> +					  offsetof(struct tcphdr, check)))
> >> +			goto out;
> >>  
> >>  		if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> >> -			struct tcphdr *tcph = (struct tcphdr *)th;
> >> +			struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
> >>  			tcph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
> >>  							 skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
> >>  							 IPPROTO_TCP, 0);
> >>  		}
> >>  		break;
> >>  	case IPPROTO_UDP:
> >> -		skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct udphdr, check);
> >> +		if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
> >> +					  offsetof(struct udphdr, check)))
> >> +			goto out;
> >>  
> >>  		if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> >> -			struct udphdr *udph = (struct udphdr *)th;
> >> +			struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
> >>  			udph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
> >>  							 skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
> >>  							 IPPROTO_UDP, 0);
> >> @@ -1215,9 +1212,6 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	if ((th + skb->csum_offset + 2) > skb_tail_pointer(skb))
> >> -		goto out;
> >> -
> >>  	err = 0;
> >>  
> >>  out:
> >
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-11  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-11  6:35 Jason Wang
2013-04-11  7:46 ` Ian Campbell
2013-04-11  7:58   ` Jason Wang
2013-04-11  8:03     ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2013-04-12 18:59 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1365667420.27868.125.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®