[PATCH 1/6] cpufreq/intel_pstate: remove idle time and duration from sample and calculations

[dirk.brandewie@gmail.com]

From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>

Idle time is taken into account in the APERF/MPERF ratio calculation
there is no reason for the driver to track it seperately.  This
reduces the work in the driver and makes the code more readable.

Removal of the tracking of sample duration removes the possibility of
the divide by zero exception when the duration is sub 1us

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56691

Reported-by: Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   45 +++++++--------------------------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 4d6b988..5370b8d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -48,12 +48,7 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y)
 }
 
 struct sample {
-	ktime_t start_time;
-	ktime_t end_time;
 	int core_pct_busy;
-	int pstate_pct_busy;
-	u64 duration_us;
-	u64 idletime_us;
 	u64 aperf;
 	u64 mperf;
 	int freq;
@@ -91,8 +86,6 @@ struct cpudata {
 	int min_pstate_count;
 	int idle_mode;
 
-	ktime_t prev_sample;
-	u64	prev_idle_time_us;
 	u64	prev_aperf;
 	u64	prev_mperf;
 	int	sample_ptr;
@@ -450,48 +443,26 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu,
 					struct sample *sample)
 {
 	u64 core_pct;
-	sample->pstate_pct_busy = 100 - div64_u64(
-					sample->idletime_us * 100,
-					sample->duration_us);
 	core_pct = div64_u64(sample->aperf * 100, sample->mperf);
 	sample->freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * core_pct * 1000;
 
-	sample->core_pct_busy = div_s64((sample->pstate_pct_busy * core_pct),
-					100);
+	sample->core_pct_busy = core_pct;
 }
 
 static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
-	ktime_t now;
-	u64 idle_time_us;
 	u64 aperf, mperf;
 
-	now = ktime_get();
-	idle_time_us = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu->cpu, NULL);
-
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
-	/* for the first sample, don't actually record a sample, just
-	 * set the baseline */
-	if (cpu->prev_idle_time_us > 0) {
-		cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT;
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].start_time = cpu->prev_sample;
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].end_time = now;
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].duration_us =
-			ktime_us_delta(now, cpu->prev_sample);
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].idletime_us =
-			idle_time_us - cpu->prev_idle_time_us;
-
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf;
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf;
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf -= cpu->prev_aperf;
-		cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf -= cpu->prev_mperf;
-
-		intel_pstate_calc_busy(cpu, &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]);
-	}
+	cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT;
+	cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf;
+	cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf;
+	cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf -= cpu->prev_aperf;
+	cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf -= cpu->prev_mperf;
+
+	intel_pstate_calc_busy(cpu, &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]);
 
-	cpu->prev_sample = now;
-	cpu->prev_idle_time_us = idle_time_us;
 	cpu->prev_aperf = aperf;
 	cpu->prev_mperf = mperf;
 }
-- 
1.7.7.6